Legal Opinion
KAI LIU and JASON L. CARBONNEAU, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SEALY, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 25, 2026No. 2:24-cv-05490Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KAI LIU and JASON L. CARBONNEAU, Case No.: 2:24-cv-05490-MEMF-AS individually, and on behalf of all others 10 similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND 11 [DKT. NO. 57] Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 SEALY, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, 14 inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Remand, Dkt. No. 57. For the reasons 21 stated herein, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion. 22 23 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 I. Background 2 A. Factual Allegations1 3…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.