Legal Opinion

Sewall v. Fitz-Inn Auto Parks, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 15, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff seeks recovery of the value of his automobile, which was left by him on the defendant’s parking lot early on the morning of April 15,1970, and was gone when he returned for it early that evening, it having apparently been stolen by an unidentified third person. The declaration is in two counts, one based on a theory of breach of the defendant’s contractual duty to safeguard the automobile and the other based on principles of ordinary negligence. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge directed verdicts for the defendant on both counts. The propriety of that action is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Sandler v. Commonwealth Station Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. North Terminal Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Doherty v. ErnstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Soutier v. KaplowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hewi v. CerrioneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Commodore Leasing, Inc. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Rokosa v. Hartford Jai Alai, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1981
  4. Royal Insurance Co. v. MARINA INDUS., INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. In re Haley & Steele, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API