Legal Opinion
Rokosa v. Hartford Jai Alai, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 13, 1981No. FILE NO. 1036PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from the court’s granting of summary judgment to the defendant as to the first count of the plaintiff’s complaint which alleges a breach of a bailment contract.
The facts do not appear to be in dispute. On May 11,1979, the plaintiff went to the defendant’s fronton to attend a jai alai performance. Upon arriving at the defendant’s premises, the plaintiff noticed signs indicating that three kinds of parking facilities were available. These were labeled “VALET PARK $2”; “SELF PARK $1”; and “FREE PARKING AT YOUR OWN RISK.” The plaintiff elected to use the “self park”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Sparrow v. Airport Parking Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Ellish v. Airport Parking Co. of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Seedman v. JafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlisle v. District Board of TrusteesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993