Rentoul v. Sweeney
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The defense made to this bill is twofold. First, it is contended that the evidence shows that the defendant in taking the reconveyance from her sister, the complainant, of the twelve-acre tract and in her subsequent dealings with that property and its proceeds, acted solely in her own absolute right as a purchaser and owner and in no sense as a trustee or agent for her sister. But, second, if it be granted that the defendant was not an absolute purchaser from her sister, yet the latter is not entitled to the relief sought for the reason that on her own showing the conveyance by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. LivingstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1869
- Pierson v. PiersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1874
- Harvey v. PennypackerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1872
3Cited by13 opinions
- John Julian Construction Co. v. Monarch Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Sharpless-Hendler Ice Cream Co. v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
- Sadowski v. RykaczewskiCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
- Haggerty v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
- Bradford v. VintonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.