Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cole

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1957No. 36743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Since, under Code § 81-1301, all parties as a matter of right may amend their pleading in all respects prior to judgment, it was error for the trial court to refuse the plaintiff’s amendment offering to strike paragraph 17 of her petition which alleged: “The assault on petitioner was wholly unprovoked.” The error was not harmful to plaintiff, however, where another paragraph as to which no offer to amend was made also alleged that the assault and battery was unprovoked. Both paragraphs were denied by the answers, and, under the latter, even with the former paragraph stricken, the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Rigden v. Jordan & StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Berkner v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Hutcheson v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Robinson v. DeVaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Nash v. Hess Oil & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API