Constanza v. Adamatic A Corp.

—In an *496action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), dated June 2, 1994, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 21, 1994, which denied a motion denominated as a motion to renew, but which was in actuality a motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 21, 1994, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,