Legal Opinion
Murillo v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 26, 1997No. 96-942PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
This case is before the Court at this point on the Secretary’s motion to dismiss the appeal, which is opposed by the appellant. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Secretary’s motion to dismiss.
I. Background
On July 29, 1996, the pro se appellant, service-connected veteran Jose R. Murillo, filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) from a July 18, 1995, Board of Veterans’ Appeal (Board or BVA) decision. The record presently before the Court reveals the following procedural chronology:
7/18/95: BVA decision.
8/10/95: BVA receives the appellant’s first motion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosler v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Fugere v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- James P. Mayer, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cerullo v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Oscar G. Fugere v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jaquay v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- John McBurney v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Browne v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Steven Reed v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- David A. Mays v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.