Legal Opinion

Angelica R. Untalan v. Warren A. Stanley

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 2, 2021No. 2:19-cv-07599Unknown

1Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 ANGELICA R. UNTALAN, Case № 2:19-cv-07599-ODW (JEMx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR 14 WARREN A. STANLEY, et al., PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. [94] [97] 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Before the Court are the parties’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on 19 Plaintiff Angelica Untalan’s claims arising under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and California 20 Civil Code section 52.1. (Defs. Mot. Partial Summ. J. (“DMot.”), ECF No. 94; Pl. 21 Mot.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API