Jun Suk Seo v. Walsh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Following a trial, a jury found that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The plaintiff moved, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence, and based on allegedly inflammatory and highly prejudicial remarks made by the defense counsel in summation. The defendant Edward A. Walsh (hereinafter the defendant) opposed both grounds for setting aside the verdict. The Supreme Court concluded that defense counsel’s summation remarks improperly influenced the jury, granted the plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Vassura v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- McArdle v. HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milewski v. Washington Mutual, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Coma v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Chiantella v. VishnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lariviere v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Reilly v. St. Charles Hosp. & Rehabilitation Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.