Legal Opinion
Nebraska v. Wyoming
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 30, 1995No. 108 ORIGPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
Since 1945, a decree of this Court has rationed the North Platte River among users in Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado. By petition in 1986, Nebraska again brought the matter before us, and we appointed a Special Master to conduct the appropriate proceedings. In his Third Interim Report on Motions to Amend Pleadings (Sept. 9, 1994) (hereinafter Third Interim Report), the Master has made recommendations for rulings on requests for leave to amend filed by Nebraska and Wyoming. We now have before us the parties’ exceptions to the Master’s report, each of which we overrule.
HH
The North Platte River…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Sloley v. VanBramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. City of Memphis, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Kansas v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.