Orbovich v. Macalester College
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANICE M. SYMCHYCH, United States Magistrate.
The above matter came on for hearing before the undersigned on January 6, 1988 upon plaintiffs motion to compel responses to document requests, interrogatories, and requests for admission, and for the costs and fees incurred in bringing the motion. A Rule 16 scheduling conference was had at the same time. Plaintiff was represented by Ellen Sampson, Esq., and Kathleen Graham, Esq.; defendant was represented by Phyllis Karasov, Esq., and Bruce Kiernat, Esq.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is an action pursuant to Title VII, alleging sex…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miles v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Raddatz v. Standard Register Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Ceramic Corp. of America v. Inka Maritime Corp. Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Miles v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jackson v. Harvard UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.