Ledwell v. N.C. Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
In its sole assignment of error, respondent argues that “[t]he trial court erred in reversing the decision of the state hearing officer and in declaring that the ‘parental control’ provision in 7 C.F.R. 273.1(a)(2)(i) and in the North Carolina Food Stamp Manual, Section 6100, conflicts with the definition of a food stamp ‘household’ in 7 U.S.C. 2012(i).” We disagree.
The federal Food Stamp Act provides that:
“Household” means (1) an individual who lives alone or who, while living with others, customarily purchases food and prepares meals for home consumption separate and apart…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Patricia Dion v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services, Clayton Yeutter, Secretary of Agriculture, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Knowles v. ButzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008