Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 2008No. COA07-3Published

1ConcurrenceGeer, Judge

With respect to the merits of this appeal, I agree that the trial court should be affirmed, but I reach this conclusion on different grounds than that of the majority opinion. I concur fully with the majority opinion’s conclusion that this case does not represent a collateral attack on plaintiff’s 1994 criminal judgment imposing a sentence of 40 years. In order for this case to constitute a collateral attack, Lineberger would have to be seeking relief from his 40-year sentence. He is not. Regardless of the outcome of this case, Lineberger’s 40-year sentence remains intact. The only material…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WorthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API