Legal Opinion
Peter Thosteson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 11, 2002No. 01-14520PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Peter Thosteson filed this action against the United States seeking a refund of his partial payment of the tax penalty assessment made against him pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672, based on the failure of the company for which he worked to submit payroll withholding trust fund taxes (the “taxes”). A trial was held, and the jury returned a verdict in his favor for all tax quarters at issue. Pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the district court granted judgment as a matter of law for the Defendant United States of America (the “government”),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's DairyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Myra J. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jane McGinnis v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Peter Thosteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- National Fire Insurance Company Of Hartford v. Fortune Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- National Fire Insurance v. Fortune Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Jane McGinnis v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.