Legal Opinion
Thorm v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 10, 1932No. 4785PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, District Judge.
The defendants were convicted and sentenced on an information containing two counts, one for illegal possession of intoxicating liquors, and the other for maintaining a. nuisance, in violation of the National Prohibition Ant (27 USCA §§ 12, 33).
A motion was made to dismiss the information, on tire ground that the charge of maintaining a nuisance was not the proper subject-matter on an information. The motion was denied, and, from the judgment of conviction and sentence, this appeal was taken.
The record raises but a single question, viz., Can a person be prosecuted for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheridan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Falconi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Ex parte BredeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Winston C. Graham A/K/A Vincent Graham, A/K/A Michael Diamond A/K/A Tyrone L. Simmons, Winston C. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Alejandro Robles-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. LomasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.