Legal Opinion
In Re Subpoenas Addressed to Fish & Neave and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1975No. 75-1183PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter comes before us on appeal from citations for civil contempt of individual lawyers and law firms for refusal to produce certain documents for in camera inspection subpoenaed under the federal rules relative to ongoing litigation in the case of United States v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., filed in July 1969.
The history of the proceedings is set forth in the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law filed April 15, 1975, appended to this order. 1 After review of the briefs and record this court concludes that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herron v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald v. HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. Milton M. Dowell, Appeal Of: Donald v. MoranoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Appeal of Licht & SemonoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.