Legal Opinion

The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1973No. 73-1618PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FIELD, Circuit Judge:

We entertained this appeal upon the narrow question whether upon the termination of litigation the work product documents prepared incident thereto lose the qualified immunity extended to them under Rule 26(b)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1 and become freely discoverable in subsequent and unrelated litigation.

In this multidistrict patent-antitrust proceeding, resolution of this question is of vital importance with respect both to depositions and requests for production of documents. 2 The district judge initially concluded “that once the privilege attaches it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API