Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Majorana

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

This is a forcible detainer action. The appeal is from a judgment entered on a directed verdict for the landlord, appellee here, at the close of the opening statement of counsel for the tenant, the appellant here.

Appellant for several years had leased from appellee a storeroom located in the *540City of Louisville. The original lease was for one year and had been extended from year to year until June 1, 1949. On May 6, 1949, appellee notified appellant he would require possession of the premises at the expiration of the current lease. Appellant refused to vacate and appellee filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Tolbert v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Brinton v. MotteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API