Legal Opinion

In Re Shaquille O'Neal B.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 12, 2009No. 26734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

385 S.C. 243 (2009)

684 S.E.2d 549

In the Matter of SHAQUILLE O'NEAL B., a Minor under the Age of Seventeen,[1] Appellant.

No. 26734.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 12, 2009.

Heard November 6, 2008.

Hemphill P. Pride, II, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

Justice BEATTY.

Shaquille O'Neal B. (Appellant), a minor under the age of seventeen at the time of this proceeding in the family court, sought to remove his name from the South…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pleicones; Concurrence · Kittredge.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. WallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re Ronnie A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Hendrix v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. BeckerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BagnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API