Legal Opinion

Rea v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 2005No. B174785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

The primary issue we decide in this case is that the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board overstepped its authority by implementing new procedures relative to proceedings involving the Uninsured Employers Fund.

INTRODUCTION

Daniel Milbauer was injured on October 17, 1994, while performing his duties as a messenger and courier. Since the employer was illegally uninsured *629for workers’ compensation, Milbauer, through counsel, claimed benefits from petitioner John Rea, Acting Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, as administrator of the Uninsured Employers Fund.1 On or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. County of Kern v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. California Ass'n of Sanitation Agencies v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Nestlé Ice Cream Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API