Legal Opinion

People v. McClellan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1928No. Docket No. 1567PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of simple assault and from an order denying appellant's motion for a new trial. The respondent has made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant altogether failed to "present an application to the trial court stating in general terms the grounds of the appeal and the points upon which the appellant relies," as was required by section 1247 of the Penal Code on January 1, 1927, and thereafter until repealed, and which respondent claims is still required thereby by virtue of the saving clause which was made a part of section 1246…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Garrett v. Superior Court of Kern Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. FlahertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. In Re BathurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API