Scott v. Louisville N. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This case was tried on count 8, a wanton or willful one, and as to which contributory negligence was not, and could not have been, properly pleaded. Therefore there was no error upon the part of the trial court in refusing the plaintiff’s requested charges dealing with contributory negligence which was in no sense an issue in the case, notwithstanding some of the proof, which was a part of the res gestse, may have had a- tendency to show contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff’s intestate.
It is true that a wanton killing need not amount to murder,"but there was no error in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Peters v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Conway v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Chambers v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Southern Ry. Co. v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.