Legal Opinion
Western Telephone Corp. v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1936No. 25339PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSBORN, V. C. J.
This is an appeal by the Western Telephone Corporation, here’n-after referred to as the company, from an order of the Corporation Commission reduc ing telephone rates for the city of Kingfisher and vicinity.
On June 19, 1931, the city of Kingfisher filed with the commission a petition asking that the company he required to install a modern telephone system at its Kingfisher exchange. At that time the telephone system was of the type commonly known as a magneto telephone system. The system which the city sought to have installed was a common battery or central energy telephone…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Muskogee Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- City of Bartlesville v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bennett v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Southwestern Light & Power Co. v. City of ElkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940