Legal Opinion

Burmeister v. Hamann

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1929No. 39641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C. J.-

In October, 1927, William J. Hamann was the owner of the property in controversy herein, to wit, Lots 1, 2, and 3 in Block 2 in Westholme Second Addition to the city of Davenport, Iowa, also known as No. 2150 West Locust Street in said city, which was his home, which he apparently occupied alone. Anna C. H. Burmeister, 59 years of age, was in the employ of Hamann, as housekeeper. On the 20th day of October, 1927, these two parties entered into a written contract, by the terms of which Mrs. Burmeister was employed as housekeeper, to devote all of her time to the care of Hamann…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hankins v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Shaull v. ShaullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Franklin v. TuckermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Manchester v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Des Moines Valley R. R. v. GraffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Drake v. BlockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Patterson v. BinghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Fritz v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  5. May v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API