Shaull v. Shaull
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ioioa District Court. — R. P. Howell, Judge. Action to quiet title. Opinion states the facts. Decree in the court below dismissing plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
I. The plaintiffs, and the defendants Michael Shaull and Eva Shriver, are the children of George W. Shaull, deceased. Defendant Sarah O. Shaull is his widow. The plaintiffs, being four in number, claim a four-sixth interest in a certain 80 acres of land, of which it is claimed George W. Sliaull died seized. They bring this action, asking that their title be quieted as against the defendants. Defendants deny that the plaintiffs have any interest in the land, or had any interest in the land at the time of the death of George W. Shaull, as his heirs or otherwise. Michael Shaull claims to be the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Shackeltow v. SebreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Wilson v. CarricoIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Lewis v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Leaver v. GaussSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Keck v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- In Re Estate of LundgrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Manchester v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Goodman v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.