Legal Opinion
Steven Jay Sencial v. Joseph Lopinto III, et al.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 15, 2026No. 2:23-cv-03351Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA STEVEN JAY SENCIAL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-3351 JOSEPH LOPINTO III, ET AL. SECTION: (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court, on consent of the parties under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77) filed by defendants Deputy Jody Lee Banks and Sheriff Joseph Lopinto III (“Defendants”) through counsel. Plaintiff Steven Jay Sencial (“Sencial”) filed an opposition to the motion. ECF No. 84. Neither party requested oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 78.1 and the Court agrees that oral…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.