Wolfe v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Tinsley
Affirming.
The appellant was convicted in the Pendleton circuit court of the crime of seduction, and sentenced to the penitentiary for one year. To reverse the judgment against him, he urges, first, that the trial court should have sustained his motion for a peremptory instruction.
A recital of the facts is not necessary. It is sufficient to say that the testimony of the prosecutrix shows a state of facts, which, if true, contains’all the elements of the crime denounced, by section 1214 of Kentucky Statutes. Appellant does not deny the intercourse, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jordan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Hoskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Berry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Duggins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Meredith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Cox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Peyton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.