Legal Opinion

Tacoma Bituminous Paving Co. v. Sternberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1901No. 3669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. James A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Action in mandamus. The petitioner (appellant), is the holder of street grade assessment warrants issued by the city of Tacoma for the improvement of Pacific avenue in said city. The action was begun by motion and affidavit. The evidence was stipulated, and *85findings thereon made by the court. The defendant is the city treasurer. The material facts are that the warrants •were drawn upon a local improvement fund created by the city council, and under Ordinance ISTo. 876, passed the 15th day of August, 1893. The ordinance creates the fund to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potter v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quaker City National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Alexander v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API