Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1962No. 396PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for certiorari in this case was granted because it was thought to present important questions involving the definition of “income” and “ordinary and necessary” business expenses under the Internal Revenue Code. 368 U. S. 913. An insurance company provided *270a trip from its home office in Dallas, Texas, to New York City for a group of its agents and their wives. Rudolph and his wife were among the beneficiaries of this trip, and the Commissioner assessed its value to them as taxable income.* It appears to be agreed between the parties that the tax consequences of the trip turn upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Commissioner v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Goodwyn Crockery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. John William Gotcher Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Robert B. Riss and Georgina Riss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. Roy O. Disney and Edna F. DisneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API