Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Hotel Tutwiler Operating Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 435PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for damages and was tried on count 2 of the complaint. It was brought by a guest and against the hotel for humiliation, worry, insult, fright, and disturbing his rest and comfort during the night.

The evidence shows that plaintiff and wife were guests of the hotel in question conducted by defendant, and that some servant or agent of the defendant, while acting in the line and scope of his employment, as alleged in said count, interrupted the guests under the circumstances detailed by the evidence and in the respects indicated by the several witnesses. It is also without dispute…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Birmingham & A. Ry. Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Alabama Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Shealy v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Glen L. Wood v. Holiday Inns, Inc., Interstate Inns, Inc., and Jessie Goynes v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Thetford v. City of ClantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Taylor v. Baptist Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Carter v. Innisfree Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API