State v. Haverty
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Horowitz, A. C. J.
The defendant Haverty was convicted by the trial court of the crime of grand larceny by possession of a ladies’ suede coat. He appeals.
Defendant’s court-appointed attorney on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and dismiss the appeal because he finds no basis on which an appeal could reasonably be prosecuted. The motions are accompanied by supporting briefs. The state supports the motion of appellant’s counsel on appeal. It is our duty to make an independent examination of the record for the purpose of determining whether the trial court committed any…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State of Washington v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. McKeownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. FullenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.