Legal Opinion

State v. Haverty

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 26, 1970No. 189-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Horowitz, A. C. J.

The defendant Haverty was convicted by the trial court of the crime of grand larceny by possession of a ladies’ suede coat. He appeals.

Defendant’s court-appointed attorney on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and dismiss the appeal because he finds no basis on which an appeal could reasonably be prosecuted. The motions are accompanied by supporting briefs. The state supports the motion of appellant’s counsel on appeal. It is our duty to make an independent examination of the record for the purpose of determining whether the trial court committed any…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. State of Washington v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State v. McKeownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. FullenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API