Legal Opinion
Almeida v. Chang
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 4, 1977No. Civ. 77-0151PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, Chief Judge.
This case of first impression concerns the interpretation of federal regulations governing the termination of certain forms of welfare assistance. 1 The regulations at issue define the extent of a recipient’s right to continued assistance pending a fair hearing on the merits of a proposed termination of benefits.
I
On or about April 1, 1977, Mrs. Rosalia Kane, a sixty year old widow who is charged with the care of her grandson, received notice from the State of Hawaii that her Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Feld v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Barrett v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Harrell v. HarderDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Burlingame v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boehm v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ortiz v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Dingle v. LamDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
- Rosas ex rel. Perez v. McMahonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Franco v. Ramsey County Community Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.