Legal Opinion
Stein v. Braum Investment & Development, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2007No. 05-56289PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
On June 16, 2004, Appellants Lawrence Chaim Stein (“Appellant Stein”) and Marc Hutson-Montroy (collectively “Appellants”) filed this amended action against Appellees Braum Investment and Development, Inc., Michael Braum and Torat Hayim (“Appellees”) asserting Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601, et seq, and other claims based upon discrimination arising from Appellants’ tenancy with Appellees. On July 25, 2005, the district court after raising, sua sponte, the availability and application of res judicata and collateral estoppel dismissed Appellants’ FHA action based upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Wood v. HersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Pelletier v. Alameda Yacht HarborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Elmo Blasi v. Robert W. Williams, Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aurora Commercial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020