Brewster v. Shrader
New York Supreme Court
Motion by the defendant for a new trial upon the judge’s minutes.
1Opinion of the CourtWerner, J.
The facts in the case are not controverted. The action is brought to recover upon a promissory note made by Sarah Doyle and indorsed by the defendant. The note bears date May 20, 1898. It was for $212.54, and is payable three months after date. The note was given as collateral security for the payment of an indebtedness from said Sarah Doyle to the plaintiffs, for goods previously sold and delivered, and which was due when said note was given. Ho express agreement for an extension of time of payment was made when said note was given. The defendant testifies without contradiction, that prior…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
- Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Ph&338nix Insurance Company v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- German American Bank v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Sutherland v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Birket v. ElwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Felt v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Myers v. Bibee Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.