Sutherland v. Mead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal "by the defendants, Charles H. Mead and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of November, 1902, denying the said defendants’ motion to vacate and set aside a judgment theretofore entered against them in this action or to modify the said judgment by reducing the recovery to the sum of $150.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
This aetion'was brought to recover upon a promissory note made by the defendant Deshong, upon which the appellants were accommodation indorsers. It appeared upon the hearing of the motion that the defendant Palleske was indebted to the appellants upon a promissory note for the sum of $1,000; that as such note was about falling due and on the 15th day of April, 1902, Palleske requested the appellants to accept in payment of such note the promissory note executed by Deshong, set forth in the complaint in the action ; that they refused so to accept the same unless Palleske could…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
- Metropolitan National Bank of New York v. LoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Comstock v. . HierNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Payne v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Mayer v. . HeidelbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelso Co. v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Margaret McGrath & Henry J. McCoy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
- Felt v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- In re Hopper-Morgan Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1907
- Bank of America v. WaydellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.