Legal Opinion

Matter of Bervilacqua v. Clark

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the disability caused solely by the accident is due to the loss of a member.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Claim of Riegle v. FordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Liberty Stevedoring Co. v. CardilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1937
  4. Claim of Conway v. Aluminum & Brass Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API