Legal Opinion
Castillo v. GEICO Casualty Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01259Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MIKE CASTILLO, Case No.: 2:19-cv-1259-APG-VCF 4 Plaintiff Order (1) Granting in Part Motion to Dismiss, (2) Denying Motion to Bifurcate, 5 v. and (3) Granting Leave to Amend 6 GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, [ECF Nos. 6, 7] 7 Defendant 8 9 Plaintiff Mike Castillo sues his insurer, defendant GEICO Casualty Company (GEICO), 10 following a car accident in which he was injured. Castillo believes the at-fault driver’s $15,000 11 insurance policy was insufficient to cover his injuries, so he submitted a claim with GEICO for 12 underinsured motorist…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- James Hirst v. Jean GertzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- American Excess Insurance v. MGM Grand Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.