Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. TC 34-155, SC 24734PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*29TOMPKINS, J.,

Pro Tempore.

This is a suit in equity in which plaintiffs seek to establish an access easement across land of defendants-intervenors. Defendant claims a leasehold interest in that portion of the land lying in the roadway. Answering separately, both defendant and defendants-intervenors counterclaimed for injunctions to prevent plaintiffs from using the roadway and for incidental money damages allegedly resulting from trespasses by plaintiffs in using the roadway.

The trial court denied equitable relief to plaintiffs and, with some modifications, granted the equitable relief sought…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reeder v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Estate of Coon v. HumbleOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ellison v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Troutman v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Albany & Eastern Railroad Co. v. Martell??Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Bunnell v. BernauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Reeves v. National Hydraulics Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API