Maybank & Co. v. Rogers
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Florence, April, 1910. Action by Maybank & Co. against F. M. Rogers. Defendant appeals. cite; The allegations are insufficient: 45 S. C. 364; 31 Cyc. 81, 86; 4 Ency. P. & P. 746; 32 S. C. 144; 58 S. C. 495; 31 Cyc. 102; 6 Ency.
Read the full summary
Before Gary, J., Florence, April, 1910. Action by Maybank & Co. against F. M. Rogers. Defendant appeals. cite; The allegations are insufficient: 45 S. C. 364; 31 Cyc. 81, 86; 4 Ency. P. & P. 746; 32 S. C. 144; 58 S. C. 495; 31 Cyc. 102; 6 Ency. P. & P. 270; 12 Pac. 822; 2 Brev. 428; 28 S. C. 396; 31 Cyc. 335; 107 S. W. 415; Code 1902, 2310, 2311; 50 S. C. 537; 54 S. C. 382; 56 S. C. Ill; 72 S. C. 35; 77 C. C. A. 164; 85 Tenn. 572; 21 S. W. 898;.24 S. W. 184; 33 S. W. 783. Averment of intention is not admitted by demurrer: 1 McM. 57; 32 S. C. 129; 36 S. C. 485; 55 S. C. 342; 9 Cranch. 417; 19…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion' of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones.
The appeal herein is from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint upon two causes of action for the recovery of damages aggregating $17,187.50, for alleged breach of contracts for the sale and delivery of cotton.
The complaint on the first cause of action alleged substantially: (1) That plaintiff is a domestic corporation engaged in the business of buying and selling cotton for profit; (2) that defendant agreed in writing, on June 23, 1909, to sell to plaintiff five hundred bales of cotton to be delivered at Florence, S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Gist v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Leesville Mfg. Co. v. Morgan Wood & Iron WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Ellison & Co. v. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Riordan & Co. v. DotySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baltimore Trust Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Swift & Co. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922