Reehil v. . Fraas
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1908, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial. This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of an employee of the defendant.
1Per curiam
Bone of the defendant’s exceptions to rulings upon evidence, or upon instructions to the jury, presents error, justifying the reversal of the judgment by the Appellate Division. Hence, as the order appealed from states that the reversal was “on questions of law only,” it must be reversed and the judgment of the Trial Term affirmed. The errors principally insisted upon by the appellant below and respondent here, and which are discussed in the opinion below, relate to exceptions taken by the defendant to the remarks of the plaintiffs’ counsel in summing up his case to the jurors. These…
2Cited by19 opinions
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wilson v. BodianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Perlman v. ShanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Chandler v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.