Legal Opinion
State v. Kinsey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 2, 1977PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The defendant was charged in an information with the sale of narcotics in violation of § 19-480 (a) of the General Statutes and found guilty on a trial to a jury. He appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict and briefed the following issues: (1) error in the denial of his motion to suppress, (2) error in certain rulings on evidence, and (3) error in permitting certain arguments to the jury.
Evidence was submitted at the trial from which the jury could have found the following facts: In the afternoon of June 9, 1971, Officer Michael DiLullo, a police undercover agent, was approached by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. UbaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.