Legal Opinion
Wirebounds Patents Co. v. Saranac Automatic MacH. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1930No. 5076Published
1Opinion of the Court
37 F.2d 830 (1930)
WIREBOUNDS PATENTS CO. et al.
v.
SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACH. CORPORATION.
No. 5076.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
January 25, 1930.
Laurence A. Janney, of Chicago, Ill. (Emery, Booth, Janney & Varney, of Boston, Mass., and A. Trevor Jones, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellants.
Howard M. Cox, of Chicago, Ill., and A. C. Paul, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Cheever & Cox, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee.
Before DENISON, MACK, and KNAPPEN, Circuit Judges.
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Infringement suit, based upon three patents issued February 9, 1915, to Inwood and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.