Legal Opinion
Bdt Products, Inc. Buro-Datentechnik Gmbh & Company Kg v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2005No. 03-6587PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
The district court granted Lexmark’s motions for summary judgment in the underlying litigation and entered judgment in favor of Lexmark on September 2, 2003.1 On October 2, 2003, Lexmark submitted its bill of costs seeking $348,303.41. BDT filed objections to Lexmark’s bill of costs on October 16, 2003. The district court rejected BDT’s objections and ordered the clerk to tax the costs as laid out in Lex-mark’s bill of costs, which the clerk did on November 7, 2003. BDT now appeals that order of the district court. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Rose Ann Wilkerson, Ray Wilkerson and Sharon Sutton v. Harold Johnson, Fred Bush, Roy "Bud" Nail, Jr., and Lola WooldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Luther Stanley v. Cottrell Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Extra Equipamentos E Exportaçáo Ltda. v. Case Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.