Steele v. Fannie Mae
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Christopher Steele filed a motion for partial summary judgment on his promissory estoppel claim. Defendant Fannie Mae, formally known as the Federal National Mortgage Association, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on all of Steele’s claims — breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraudulent misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because Steele did not respond to Fannie Mae’s arguments with respect to breach of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Mastro, Brian A. v. Potomac Elec PowerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Nwosu v. BolducDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025