Legal Opinion

Howe v. State Highway Board

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 2, 1963No. 382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

In a land condemnation case, sometimes the taking results in adding value to the remaining property of the owner. If so, when does this reduce the damages he is entitled to recover for the land taken? The answer to the question is to be derived from a consideration of 19 V.S.A. §221(2) as applied to a given situation. The statute referred to reads as follows: . . The added value, if any, to the remaining property or right therein, which inures directly to the owner thereof as a result of such taking or use, as distinguished from the general public benefit, shall be considered in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Demers v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Crawford v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. United States v. AlcornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Adams v. St. Johnsbury & Lake Champlain R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Town of Williston v. Pine Ridge School, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. William E. v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Mattson v. ColonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Smith v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API