Legal Opinion
William E. v. Agency of Transportation
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 14, 2006No. 05-243, 05-244, 05-262, 05-263 and 05-306PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. These appeals arise from a project to reconstruct a portion of U.S. Route 7 in Shelburne and South Burlington. Four of the five appeals were consolidated for argument, and we have consolidated all five for decision because they share questions of law and fact. Landowners appeal from superior court rulings that the State of Vermont does not owe compensation for decreased traffic flow resulting from a median strip constructed as part of the highway project. We affirm.
¶ 2. Landowners William and Laura Ehrhart, The Christmas Loft, Inc., The Kurt V. Reichelt Revocable Trust, and Stephen Metz…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. ENSLEYIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Division of Administration v. Capital PlazaSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- In Re South Burlington-Shelburne Highway ProjectSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Painter v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re South Burlington/Shelburne HighwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Paul v. PriorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.