Legal Opinion

Magnus v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 2011No. 09-CO-1312, 10-CO-245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

In December 1996, appellant Dave Mag-nus entered unconditional pleas of guilty to charges of carrying a pistol without a license, possession of an unregistered firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. The charges were based on evidence that he possessed handguns and handgun ammunition in his home. Magnus was sentenced to a one-year term of probation, and he took no appeal. Eleven years later, however, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 1 the Supreme Court held that the District’s general ban on possession of usable handguns in the home violated the Second…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. SURUR FATUMABAHIRTU v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Bangura v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. In re: M.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API