SURUR FATUMABAHIRTU v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BECKWITH, Associate Judge:
Fatuma Bahiru Surur 1 appeals the denial of her petition for a writ of error coram nobis alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and the denial of her motion under the Innocence Protection Act, D.C. Code §§ 22-4181 to -4135 (2012 Repl.), to set aside her 2008 conviction for attempted possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to sell, D.C. Code §§ 48-1103 (b), 22-1803 (2012 Repl.). We conclude that Ms. Surur’s trial counsel rendered constitutionally deficient performance when he failed to investigate a mistaken-identification defense. Absent this failure,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bangura v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- MacArthur D. Williams v. US (previously released as an MOJ)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Richardson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Truesdale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026