Patrykus v. Tracy

On their appeal Michael and Matilda Patrykus contend the court erred in finding and concluding that when the instrument of December 27, 1943, was executed by Del-mady, he—

“did not possess sufficient active memory to be able to collect and comprehend, without prompting, the condition of his property, his relations to those persons who might properly be his beneficiaries and the scope and bearing of his will, and to hold these things in his mind a sufficient length of time to perceive their obvious relations to each other and be able to form a rational judgment in relation to them;”

and that the…