Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Gaudynski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1970No. 94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

This case presents no new questions of law but only the application of well-established law governing testamentary capacity and undue influence to the facts.

Testamentary Capacity.

The test for testamentary capacity in this state was originally taken from Delafield v. Parish (1862), 25 N. Y. 9. See Holden v. Meadows (1872), 31 Wis. 284. The rule has been stated in essentially the same form in many cases but generally as stated in Will of Wicker (1961), 15 Wis. 2d 86, 88, 112 N. W. 2d 137:

“The test is not whether the testator did the best or the wisest or the theoretically just .thing in his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of JackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In re WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Estate of O'LoughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Rahr v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Casper v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ward v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API